"Winning" the Ovarian Lottery

The idea of the Ovarian Lottery - or "the random accident of why you were born with one time, place, and identity rather than another" - has been previously popularized by Buffett as the lucky random chance of being born to more blessings and opportunities.

Buffett's thought experiment: imagine 24 hours before birth, you had to design society from behind a "veil of ignorance" - not knowing if you'd be born rich or poor, healthy or sick, in Silicon Valley or rural Bangladesh, male or female, in 1950 or 2024.

The Lottery Mechanism

Think of it like this: there's a giant hat with billions of possible combinations of circumstances

  • You reach in and pull out your slip of paper
  • Geographic coordinates (determines your country, city, neighborhood)
  • Time coordinates (your birth decade)
  • Biological coordinates (genetics, health, cognitive wiring)
  • Family coordinates (wealth, education, connections, cultural capital)

The slip you draw becomes your starting conditions. Everything else flows from there.

What You Can't Control

  • Where you're born (determines language, legal system, economic opportunities, cultural norms)
  • When you're born (determines technology available, economic conditions, social movements)
  • Who you're born to (determines early resources, networks, expectations, educational access)
  • How you're born (determines baseline health, cognitive abilities, physical traits)

What You Can Control

  • How you respond to your starting conditions
  • What you do with whatever advantages you drew
  • How you navigate the constraints you inherited
  • Whether you recognize the lottery at all

How the Lottery Actually Works

Consider two scenarios:

Lottery Winner A: Born in Palo Alto, 1995, to Stanford professors who own a house worth $3M, speak fluent English, have 401k accounts, know how to navigate university admissions, can afford unpaid internships, have networks in tech companies

Lottery Winner B: Born in rural Mississippi, 1995, to parents working minimum wage jobs, first generation to consider college, no family networks in white-collar professions, needs to work through school to pay for basic expenses

Both work equally hard. Both are equally intelligent. Both make good decisions within their constraints.

The difference in outcomes isn't about merit - it's about the compounding effects of different lottery draws.

The Geography Lottery

If you're born in:

  • Switzerland: median wealth $227k, universal healthcare, excellent public education
  • Somalia: median wealth under $1k, ongoing conflict, limited infrastructure
  • San Francisco: proximity to tech networks, venture capital, higher education density
  • Small rural town: different industry access, different network effects, different cost structures

Same effort, same intelligence, different contexts = different opportunity sets

The Time Lottery

Born in:

  • 1950: entered job market during economic boom, could buy house for 2x median income, pensions were standard
  • 1990: entered job market during internet boom, still could buy house for 4x median income, 401k system established
  • 2000: graduated into dot-com crash, entered housing bubble, defined contribution retirement
  • 2024: AI revolution beginning, houses cost 8x median income, gig economy normalized

The timing of when you enter various markets (education, housing, job, investment) dramatically affects your available moves.

The Biology Lottery

Your genetic draw affects:

  • Baseline intelligence and cognitive processing speed
  • Physical health and energy levels
  • Mental health and stress resilience
  • Physical appearance (which affects social interactions whether we admit it or not)
  • Predispositions toward various skills and interests

These aren't deterministic, but they affect your available strategies and energy allocation.

The Family Lottery

The family you're born into determines:

  • Financial resources available for education, experiences, risk-taking
  • Cultural capital (knowledge of how systems work, expectations about what's possible)
  • Social networks (who your parents know, what industries they understand)
  • Early experiences that shape your baseline assumptions about the world

The Compounding Effect

Here's where it gets interesting: lottery advantages don't just add up, they multiply.

If you win the geography lottery (Silicon Valley) + time lottery (born 1980) + family lottery (parents in tech), you don't just get three separate advantages. You get compounding effects:

  • Better schools → better college → better internships → better first job → better networks → better next job → better investment opportunities → better risk-taking capacity → cycle continues

Meanwhile, if you lose multiple lottery draws, you don't just face three separate disadvantages - you face compounding constraints:

  • Weaker schools → need to work during school → less time for applications → fewer college options → more debt → need immediate income → less network building → fewer opportunities → less risk-taking capacity → cycle continues

Network Effects

The most powerful lottery advantage might be Network Effects:

  • Rich parents know other rich parents
  • Their kids go to the same schools
  • They do internships at each other's companies
  • They invest in each other's startups
  • They hire each other
  • They marry each other
  • Their kids repeat the cycle

It's not conspiracy - it's just that similar people cluster together, and advantages compound within clusters.

Lottery Winners vs. Non-Winners

So what actually distinguishes outcomes between people with different lottery draws?

Available Strategies

High lottery winners can:

  • Take unpaid internships (parents can subsidize living expenses)
  • Start companies (family safety net if it fails)
  • Move to expensive opportunity-rich cities (family help with rent/deposits)
  • Invest early (don't need money for immediate expenses)
  • Optimize for long-term career growth over immediate income

Lower lottery winners often must:

  • Work for income immediately
  • Stay geographically constrained by family obligations/costs
  • Optimize for shorter-term financial stability
  • Use available time for income generation rather than network building

Same intelligence, same work ethic, different strategic constraints.

Risk Tolerance

If you have a family safety net, you can:

  • Take higher risk/higher reward career paths
  • Start businesses
  • Negotiate harder in job situations
  • Leave bad situations more quickly
  • Invest in assets rather than keep cash for emergencies

Without a safety net, rational behavior looks more like:

  • Optimizing for stability over upside
  • Taking jobs that might not be ideal but pay reliably
  • Staying in situations longer than optimal
  • Keeping larger cash buffers

Different risk capacities lead to different outcomes, even with identical decision-making ability.

Strategic Implications

If you recognize you won certain lottery draws, what are the strategic implications?

Resource Allocation

  • How much of your success comes from advantages you inherited vs. created?
  • What percentage of your time/money should you allocate to leveraging inherited advantages vs. creating new ones?
  • How do you use platforms you didn't build to build platforms others can use?

Network Leverage

  • What networks did you inherit access to?
  • How do you expand those networks rather than just extract from them?
  • How do you create access for people who didn't inherit the same networks?

Risk Distribution

  • If you can afford to take risks others can't, what risks are worth taking?
  • How do you use your risk capacity to create value rather than just capture it?
  • What experiments can you run that others can't afford to run?

Why Lottery Stories Persist

If so much depends on lottery draws, why do Meritocracy stories persist?

  • Winners want to believe they earned their success (feels better than "I got lucky")
  • Non-winners want to believe winners earned it (preserves hope that effort matters)
  • System benefits from merit narratives (encourages effort, justifies unequal outcomes)
  • Lottery effects are often invisible to those experiencing them

But recognizing the lottery doesn't eliminate the value of effort - it just provides context for understanding why similar effort produces different outcomes.

Related Concepts

The lottery isn't destiny, but it's also not irrelevant. Understanding which draws you got - and which you didn't - affects how you play the hand you're dealt.

Links to this note

Learning in Public

This page will include thoughts about learnings as I go through life (Learning in Public). Learnings: